Thomas aquinas central to thomism the life work of st. Rowe an examination of the cosmological argument rintintin. One reason for this is that versions with restri cted or even no reliance on the principle of sufficient reason psr have been formulated. Cosmological argument these keywords were added by machine and not by the authors.
Cosmological argument the term cosmological argument refers to the procedure of arguing from the cosmosworld, to the existence of god. As a student of philosophy, i give it two thumbs up. Aquinas first way was the argument of motion, this form of the cosmological argument sprung from the observation that everything is acted upon by something else. If something now exists and it is not the case that something has always existed then something has been produced out of nothing. In chapter ii of william rowe s the cosmological argument, rowe presents samuel clarkes argument for the conclusion that something has existed from eternity as follows. The cosmological argument was first proposed by st thomas aquinas, a great christian thinker one his five proofs for the existence of god the universe exists.
Cosmological argument stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Most philosophers who have considered the matter, however, have dis agreed. But by the eighteenth century, anselms basic principle had been more fully elaborated and had received a name, the principle of sufficient reason. Lets examine both philosophical arguments and scientific evidence in support of premise 2. By the cosmological argument i mean to refer to samuel clarkes argument that there must be a necessarily existent being who is the cause of the existence of contingent beings. Cosmological argument essay sample new york essays. The principle of sufficient reason is likewise employed by samuel clark in his cosmological argument rowe 1975, chap. Categories cosmological arguments for theism in philosophy of religion. In the light of this principle, he examines the argument itself and four objections to it. The cosmological argument is a family of arguments that seek to demonstrate the existence of a sufficient reason or first cause of the existence of the cosmos. Thomas press, 1972, and william rowe, t7je cosmological argument new york. Cosmological argument page 2 of 5 the kalem is a version of the cosmological argument coming from the islamic tradition.
Psr had been laid out already in rowes 1968, 1970, 1971 earlier ariicles that later evolved into his own book on the. The cosmological argument itself, however, cannot be regarded as a proof for the existence of a logically necessary being, since its premises either express or rest on the psr, whose truth value is at best unknown. Various criticisms purporting to show clarkes argument unsound rowe submits to probing analyses and finally assesses as failures. It is a contradiction of the concept of time to speak of a time before time. The reasoning process is a posteriori, from effects obsevable in the universe to a cause that do not fall directly under human experience, and in this respect is different from that employed in the ontological argument, which is. The cosmological argument and the principle of sufficient.
Versions of the cosmological argument flashcards quizlet. Oxford university press usa publishes scholarly works in all academic disciplines, bibles, music, childrens books, business books, dictionaries, reference books, journals, text books and more. The cosmological argument attempts to prove that god exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things all things that exist. In defending the faith, however, it is useful to present a way of proving the existence of god that begins from the fact of the existence of the world. The dominican priest, thomas aquinas 12251724, used it as one of his five proofs for the existence of god in his magisterial summa theologica. It uses a general pattern of argumentation logos that makes an inference from certain alleged facts about the world cosmos to the existence of a unique being, generally referred to as god. While the god of the bible is an uncaused cause, not all uncaused cause needs to be the god of the bible. There are many more problems with the cosmological argument, but i think this will suffice.
The cosmological argument is less a particular argument than an argument type. In defending the faith, however, it is useful to present a way of proving the existence of god that. In professor mackie and the kalam cosmological argument religious studies, xx 1984, 36775, professor william lane craig undertakes to demonstrate that j. The second part is an argument to establish that this necessary being is god. An introduction to the cosmological argument worksheet. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. Although the premises of flews argument are not inconsistent with the principle of sufficient reason they do have serious implications for the cosmological argument.
Second, it will spark ones interest in researching the topic even further. May 23, 2007 the cosmological argument defines universe as the set of events since creation, and places the first cause beyond our timeline. Thus, the status of the argument remains uncertain. Oct 07, 2012 in chapter ii of william rowe s the cosmological argument, rowe presents samuel clarkes argument for the conclusion that something has existed from eternity as follows. Similarly, michael martin reasons that no current version of the cosmological argument is sound 1990, ch. Cosmological argument bruce reichenbach the cosmological argument is less a particular argument than an argument type. This attempts to avoid the criticism that god must have been caused by something. Professor rowe examines and interprets historically significant versions of the argument from aquinas to. Problems with the cosmological argument a man after god. A cosmological argument, in natural theology and natural philosophy not cosmology, is an.
Swinburne does not defend gods existence on the basis of the cosmological argument. Aquinas argued that there cannot be an infinite chain of regression otherwise the universe would not be here, but it is reducto ad absurdum and so there must be a primary mover. Project muse the cosmological argument by william l. The argument seeks to establish that there must be some. Cosmological argument a term used to designate a type of argumentation whereby one reasons from observable aspects of the universe, or cosmos, to the existence of god. Introduction a cosmological argument from contingency a cac is an argument that aims to show. The problem of evil and some varieties of atheism, american philosophical quarterly 16 4.
Third, it is a great companion book to any philosophy of religion course that takes a look at the cosmological argument. The kalam argument popular writings reasonable faith. This assertion that the cosmological argument is valid, absolutely sound, a formal demonstration, and not merely a probability argument does not hold true of any cosmological argument published in any book. On pages 120121 of his book, the cosmological argument which presents a more detailed discussion of the argument than does his philosophy of religion, rowe quotes. Rowe suggests that the cosmological argument has two parts, one to establish the existence of a first cause or necessary being, the other that this necessary being is god 1975. Though i think certain pieces are a bit dated as is the case when the field responds to to such a work, there are still key points that are valuable in current debates of perhaps the most philosophically interesting version of this type of argument which are not emphasized enough. William rowe tried to strengthen and clarify clarkes account by explaining the role of principal of sufficient reason in the argument, but concludes that the cosmological argument is only as strong as the principal of sufficient reason.
Rowe, selfexistence, and the cosmological argument, analysis, volume 42, issue 2, 1 march. What are the cosmological arguments for the existence of. The rejection of all forms of ontological argument then entails that the theist must argue from the world or from. An inductive argument for gods existence needs to take into account all the evidence, both for and against. I the other philosophical argument o ered in defense of premise 2 is that there cannot be an actual in nite in the world, merely a potential in nite. What are the cosmological arguments for the existence of god. The horizontal cosmological argument, also called the kalam cosmological argument, is a little easier to understand because it does not require much philosophizing. An a posteriori argument because it begins with a premise, based on observation, that the universe exists, and is subject to change.
The argument he defends is one that no one has ever yet written. The cosmological argument has taken many forms, with variations arguing from different premises, but for our purposes, we will examine a version called the kalam cosmological argument, developed by contemporary philosopher and theologian william lane craig. The first part is an argument to establish the existence of a necessary being. The kalam cosmological argument focusses on things coming into being. The cosmological argument for the existence of god. Leibniz 16461716 used a different form of the cosmological argument. Cosmological argument worksheet teaching resources.
The cosmological argument and the principle of sufficient reason. Issues and objections the last thilty years have witnessed a great deal of progress 011 several issues related to the cosmological argument. Cosmological argument, form of argument used in natural theology to prove the existence of god. Even if we grant the comological arguments advocate all the above, we end up in an uncaused cause. Rowe has called the principle the humeedwards principle. Thomas aquinas, in his summa theologiae, presented two versions of the cosmological argument. Although the argument is fundamentally islamic, and.
In chapter ii of william rowes the cosmological argument, rowe presents samuel clarkes argument for the conclusion that something has existed from eternity as follows 1. The roll of the defenders of this argument reads like a whos who of western philosophy. Pdf craig, mackie, and the kalam cosmological argument. The more controversial premise in the argument is premise 2, that the universe began to exist. Before stating and examining these objections it will be helpful to have before us a version of the cosmological argument the cosmological argument has two distinct parts. Rowe, william l chapter 2, the cosmological argument, philosophy of religion. The cosmological argument therefore argues for the existence of god a posteriori based on the apparent order in the universe. What links here related changes upload file special pages permanent link page information wikidata. The kalam cosmological argument is a modern formulation of the cosmological argument for the existence of god.
Possibly, then, the theist is entitled to claim that the cosmological argument is an acceptable argument for theistic belief, that it shows the reasonableness of belief in god, even though it does not demonstrate the existence of god rowe. Thomas aquinas 1225 march 7, 1274 is the idea that philosophy can help us come to a better understanding of theology the study of god. There are many arguments that can he presented to prove the existence of god. Rowe on clarkes cosmological argument not not a philosopher. First of all, it presents all of the versions of the argument spoken about in the text in a way that will deepen ones understanding of the cosmological arguments that have been given by the great thinkers through history. The cosmological argument or first cause argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of god which explains that everything has a cause, that there must have been a first cause, and that this first cause was itself uncaused. For the point of the cosmological argument is to show that there must be a stopping place to the series of explanations. This will then leave us with an agenda for future work. In other words, there cannot be an infinite number of causes that goes back in time forever. Basically, this would mean there was no first cause, and without a first cause. But in light of the cosmological argument, it becomes more probable, because gods existence is the best explanation for why the universe exists. The firstcause argument begins with the fact that there is change in the world, and a change is always the effect of some cause or causes.
I think rowe s exposition and analysis of clarkes version of the cosmological argument is wonderful. It is unclear, however, whether the second contention is an essential part of the cosmological argument. A cosmological argument, in natural theology and natural philosophy not cosmology, is an argument in which the existence of god is inferred from alleged facts concerning causation, explanation, change, motion, contingency, dependency, or finitude with respect to the universe or some totality of objects. This is in contrast to the ontological argument, which makes no use of evidence from the world, but argues by way of analysis from the concept of a. To a large extent this has been dictated by form of argument that began the discussion. The cosmological argument defines universe as the set of events since creation, and places the first cause beyond our timeline. Rowe addresses versions of the cosmological argument from aquinas, scotus and clarke, but focuses on the argument from clarke. According to rowe, we can allow someone to define god anyway he or she wants, yet it will not follow from that definition that such a being a. This is in contrast to the ontological argument, which makes no use of evidence from the world, but argues by way of analysis from the concept of a supreme perfect being. The one minute case against the cosmological argument. May 15, 2020 the horizontal cosmological argument, also called the kalam cosmological argument, is a little easier to understand because it does not require much philosophizing.
It was popularized by william lane craig in his book, the kalam cosmological argument 1979. The cosmological argument for the existence of god by w. I also make note of some of the most recent developments in arguments from contingency and point out avenues for future research. A cosmological argument from contingency a cac is an argument that aims to show that there is a selfexistent concrete being or necessary being on the basis of the fact that. This is a file in the archives of the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Rowe, 150, wholly contingent fact koons 1997, state of affairs that can be explained cf.
Plato, aristotle, ibn sina, alghazali, maimonides, anselm, aquinas, scotus, descartes, spinoza. Van til pays no attention to the fallacies embedded in thomas aquinas. The famous philosopher from the middle ages, thomas aquinas, is generally given credit for articulating what is known as the cosmological argument for the existence of god, although the bible described the essence of the argument hundreds of years before he was on the scene e. The basic argument is that all things that have beginnings had to have causes. Cosmological argument stanford encyclopedia of university of. I think rowes exposition and analysis of clarkes version of the cosmological argument is wonderful. Cosmological argument scott macdonald insumma theologiae st 1. But time is a relative measure of the rate of change between entities, not an absolute linear constant. There is a reason x for thinking that there is a first cause of things of type t.
Rowe 1975, 166 develops a different argument to support the thesis that the universe must be contingent. The recent revival of cosmological arguments david alexander baylor university abstract cosmological arguments have received more attention in the past ten years. The firstcause argument begins with the fact that there is change in the world, and a change is. Rowe, selfexistence, and the cosmological argument analysis. It tries to show that for this to be so there must exist something outside the universe which can cause or explain its existence. Since this principle psr, as we shall call it plays such an important role in justifying the premises of the cosmological argument.
1012 1430 932 1253 1604 237 1156 130 1325 724 1560 1160 1022 980 427 287 1359 547 1427 279 326 1567 1527 690 172 38 985 600 739 703 447 189 309 392 1136 1203 36 1422 172 1495 186 690 573 462 1333